Musk predicts. Samsung invests. Meta implodes.

What this week reveals about AI's real winners

January 06, 2026

Reading time: 5 minutes

🗞️In this edition

  • Elon Musk Says AI Will Make Money Irrelevant Within 20 Years

  • Samsung Bets Everything on AI and Wins Big With Investors

  • AI Legend Calls Meta's New Boss Too Young and Warns Staff Will Quit

  • In other AI news –

    • Netflix Executive Leaves Streaming Giant to Lead AI Studio's Hollywood Push

    • AI Will Book Your Entire Vacation in 2026, But Should You Let It?

    • AI Startups Raised $150 Billion in 2025, But Most Went to Just Two Companies

  • 4 must-try AI tools

Three very different stories landed this week.

Elon Musk says AI will end work within 20 years. Samsung doubles down on AI devices and watches its stock hit record highs. Meta's top AI researcher quits and calls out his replacement publicly.

These stories don't connect obviously. But they reveal the same thing.

AI is no longer about what's possible. It's about what's profitable, who's in charge, and what gets built when billions of dollars chase the same vision.

This edition looks at those tensions. Between hype and hardware. Between veterans and newcomers. Between what technology promises and what companies actually deliver.

If you want to understand where the money and power are moving, start here.

What's happening:

He's calling it "universal high income," not universal basic income. The difference matters to him, though he hasn't explained exactly what it means.

The core idea is simple. AI and robots will produce everything people need. Food, housing, healthcare, goods, services. All of it.

When everything is abundant and cheap, money stops being necessary. Work becomes a hobby, not a requirement.

Musk puts an 80 percent probability on this happening. He's not hedging. He thinks this is the likely future.

He recently told investors that saving money will become unnecessary. There will be no poverty. Everyone will have access to everything they want.

The vision borrows from science fiction, specifically The Culture series by Iain M. Banks. A world where AI handles production and humans do whatever brings them meaning.

Musk admits this raises a big question. If AI does everything better than humans, what gives life purpose? What provides meaning when work disappears?

He calls this the "benign scenario." The alternative, where things go wrong, is what he describes as "all bets are off."

Why this is important:

This matters because it's not just speculation from a random futurist. It's coming from someone building the technology that would make this possible.

Musk runs Tesla, which is developing humanoid robots. He runs xAI, which is building AI systems. He's directly involved in creating the automation he's predicting will eliminate work.

When someone with that kind of position and resources puts an 80 percent probability on something, markets and governments pay attention.

The shift from "universal basic income" to "universal high income" signals something bigger. Basic income means survival. High income means comfort, even luxury. That's a fundamentally different economic model.

The timeline is aggressive. 10 to 20 years isn't far away. Companies and workers can't wait decades to prepare. This forces immediate questions about education, job training, and social systems.

The idea challenges core assumptions about economics. If robots produce everything, who owns the robots? Who controls the AI? How does wealth get distributed if labor isn't the way people earn money?

Musk's vision requires abundant cheap energy. AI and robotics consume massive amounts of electricity. Without solving energy production at scale, the whole model breaks down.

It also requires robots to actually work in the physical world. Digital AI is advancing fast. Physical robotics that can do everything humans do? That's harder. Much harder.

The philosophical question about meaning is real. Most people derive purpose from work. From contributing. From being needed. If that disappears, societies will have to figure out what replaces it.

Comments from the editor:

What stands out is how casually Musk discusses the end of work as we know it.

He's not presenting this as science fiction anymore. He's talking about it like an engineering problem with a clear timeline.

The comparison to other tech predictions is worth noting. In 1930, economist John Maynard Keynes predicted people would work 15 hours a week by 2030 because of productivity gains. That didn't happen. People got more productive. They didn't get more leisure.

What makes this different is the technology itself. Past automation replaced muscle. AI is replacing thinking. That's a bigger shift.

Bill Gates has pushed back on similar ideas. In 2017, he said America isn't rich enough to let people stop working. Seven years later, with AI advancing rapidly, he still hasn't changed his view publicly.

The funding question is massive. Who pays for universal high income? Musk suggests abundance makes this automatic somehow, but abundance doesn't distribute itself. Someone has to own the means of production.

If a few companies own all the AI and robots that produce everything, they hold enormous power. That's not necessarily a dystopia, but it's not automatically a utopia either.

The energy piece is critical and often glossed over. Training large AI models already consumes as much electricity as small countries. Scaling that to run an entire economy? The infrastructure doesn't exist yet.

Physical robotics is the real bottleneck. Tesla's Optimus robot is impressive in demos. But it's nowhere near ready to replace human labor across all domains. Manufacturing, construction, healthcare, services. These require different capabilities.

The meaning question might be the hardest. Musk is right to worry about it. Purpose and identity are deeply tied to work for most people. Universal high income solves material needs. It doesn't solve existential ones.

Historical precedent shows wealth without work doesn't guarantee happiness. Plenty of people have enough money to never work. Many still choose to work. Not for money, but for purpose.

The political challenge is also enormous. Transitioning from a work based economy to an abundance based one requires massive coordination. Governments move slowly. Technology moves fast. That mismatch creates risk.

China is also developing AI and robotics. If they reach this point first, or if different countries reach it at different times, the geopolitical implications are huge.

The timeline might be optimistic. Ten years feels very fast. Twenty years is more plausible but still aggressive. A lot has to go right technically for this to work.

But the broader point stands. AI is advancing toward a world where human labor becomes optional in more and more domains. Whether that takes 15 years or 50 years, it's coming.

The question isn't whether to prepare. It's how to prepare. And whether societies will adapt fast enough to make the transition work for everyone, not just the people who own the AI.

What's happening:

Samsung's stock jumped 7.5 percent to a record high after the company announced huge AI expansion plans.

The CEO sent a memo to employees saying customers told him "Samsung is Back." That message got investors very excited.

Samsung plans to double the number of AI powered devices it sells. From 400 million units to 800 million units in 2026.

These devices will use both Google's Gemini AI and Samsung's own Bixby assistant. This is a major win for Google against competitors like OpenAI.

The company says it will put AI into all products, all functions, and all services as fast as possible.

Brand awareness for Samsung's Galaxy AI jumped from 30 percent to 80 percent in just one year. People are actually noticing and caring about the AI features.

The most popular AI features are search, image editing, translation, and creating summaries. These are things people use every day.

But there's a problem. A global shortage of memory chips is making it hard to build enough devices. Chip prices are going up, which hurts profit margins.

Why this is important:

Doubling AI devices to 800 million units means Samsung thinks AI is ready for mainstream adoption. Not just tech enthusiasts. Regular people buying phones and appliances.

The partnership with Google is strategic. By putting Gemini on hundreds of millions of Samsung devices, Google gets massive distribution. That helps Google compete with OpenAI and others.

For consumers, this means AI features will be everywhere. In your phone, your TV, your refrigerator. Samsung isn't treating AI as a premium feature. It's making it standard.

The chip shortage creates a timing problem. Samsung wants to flood the market with AI devices just when chips are getting expensive and hard to find. That could force them to raise prices.

Higher prices might slow adoption. If AI phones cost too much, people stick with older models. That delays the whole AI transition.

The stock jump shows investors believe in the strategy. A 7.5 percent gain in one day is huge for a company Samsung's size. Markets think this AI bet will pay off.

Samsung is also competing with Apple for smartphone leadership and with Chinese companies across all product categories. AI is the weapon they're using to fight back.

The company's position in memory chips helps and hurts at the same time. Higher chip prices help their semiconductor business but hurt their consumer products business.

What's happening:

LeCun left Meta in November after working there for over ten years. Now he's speaking out about why.

Meta hired 29 year old Alexandr Wang to lead its new AI research unit. Wang is the founder of Scale AI, a company that labels data for training AI models.

Meta paid 14 billion dollars to buy part of Scale AI and bring Wang on board. This made Wang LeCun's boss.

LeCun says Wang is young and inexperienced. He says Wang doesn't understand how research actually works or what researchers need.

LeCun also revealed that Meta's team faked some test results for their Llama 4 AI model. This made CEO Mark Zuckerberg so angry he sidelined the entire AI team.

A lot of people have already quit. LeCun predicts more will leave soon.

He's now starting his own company focused on world models. These are AI systems that learn from watching videos and understanding the physical world, not just reading text.

Why this is important:

This matters because it shows serious trouble inside one of the world's biggest AI companies.

When a respected researcher publicly criticizes his former employer, it's a big deal. LeCun isn't just anyone. He won the Turing Award, basically the Nobel Prize of computing.

Meta spent 14 billion dollars on Wang. That's one of the largest talent acquisitions ever. If it fails, it's a massive mistake.

The benchmark cheating revelation is damaging. If Meta manipulated test results to make their AI look better, trust is broken. Other companies and researchers won't take their claims seriously.

The talent exodus matters. AI companies live or die by their researchers. If Meta's best people leave, they fall behind competitors like OpenAI and Google.

LeCun's view that LLMs are a dead end challenges the entire industry. Most AI companies are betting everything on large language models. If he's right, they're wasting billions.

The age and experience debate is interesting. Silicon Valley often worships young founders. But AI research is different. It takes years of experience to understand what works.

Wang's background is in data labeling, not model building. That's like hiring someone who organizes ingredients to be head chef. Different skill sets.

The pressure from ChatGPT changed everything at Meta. Before November 2022, LeCun had freedom to explore. After ChatGPT launched, Zuckerberg wanted fast results. That rushed approach led to the Llama 4 failure.

  1. Bot Butcher - An anti-spam tool designed to protect your inbox from unwanted messages

  2. TTcare - An AI-powered mobile app that helps pet parents monitor the health of their dogs and cats

  3. Alter AI - A tool that transforms amateur selfies into professional-looking headshots

  4. Convai - A platform to create NPC characters and assets for games

AI just entered its awkward phase.

The demos are impressive. The funding is massive. But the real work is messier than anyone expected.

Researchers quit. Stocks jump on announcements. Predictions about the end of work get bolder while chip shortages slow actual production.

This is what it looks like when technology meets reality at scale.

That's what we're tracking. Not just the breakthroughs, but the friction. Not just the vision, but the execution.

If something in this edition helped you see that gap more clearly, hit reply and tell us.

We read every message.

How did we like this version?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Interested in featuring your services with us? Email us at [email protected]